Coding Agent Leaderboard v0.1.3

Performance, efficiency, coverage, and reliability across coding-agent benchmarks. Each result is one model + harness run on one benchmark.

93benchmark results
19models
6harnesses
7benchmarks
90%token coverage
98%cost coverage
99%timing coverage

Cross-benchmark ordering uses within-benchmark percentiles rather than averaging incompatible raw score scales. Missing metrics remain missing and reduce coverage; they are never converted to zero.

Rankings

Paired comparisons are shown first, followed by benchmark-specific metric rankings.

Paired Comparisons

Rankings computed from head-to-head benchmark results using a Bradley–Terry paired-comparison model. Handles missing data and inconsistent orderings.

Rank by
Benchmarks
Models
Harnesses

Harness ranking

Model ranking

Model + harness ranking

Metric rankings

Use the shared controls below to choose a benchmark and display options for all metric charts. Tables are capped to a scrollable height so the visualizations stay primary.

Benchmark
Color by
Chart order
Color palette
Image background

Score

Score (%). Higher is better.

Token usage

Total tokens per task. Lower is better.

Cost

Cost per task (USD). Lower is better.

Response time

Total time per task (seconds). Lower is better.

Reliability

Execution error rate (%). Lower is better.

Tokens per successful task

Tokens per successful task. Lower is better.

Cost per successful task

Cost per successful task (USD). Lower is better.

Time per successful task

Time per successful task (seconds). Lower is better.

Ranking data

One table for the page, placed after all charts. It includes the score, resource, timing, reliability, and per-success values for the selected benchmark.

Table benchmark
Sort table by
Table order